Gomertronic Gomertronic
  • Login
Welcome to the Gomertronic StatusNet site, home of the bearded monkey! Accounts are available, but invite only to prevent spammers. Let me know if you want an account.
  • Public

    • Public
    • Groups
    • Recent tags
    • Popular
    • Directory

Conversation

Notices

  1. Richard Fontana Richard Fontana puzzled , Free Software & Culture Group , Not a Troll , cwebber

    Isn't it sort of obvious that the reason #Debian is not !free is that it has an official nonfree repository? !notatroll !puzzled #levitation

    about 11 months ago from identi.ca
    • tekk tekk

      @fontana their reply to that is that while nonfree is handled by the debian project, it it outsid…

      about 11 months ago
    • Richard Fontana Richard Fontana Free Software & Culture Group , tekk

      @tekk War is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, and an authorized nonfree repository is !free

      about 11 months ago
    • gabrielsaldana gabrielsaldana tekk

      ♻ @fontana: @tekk War is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, and an authorized nonfree repository is #free

      about 11 months ago
    • Richard Fontana Richard Fontana Free Software & Culture Group

      Better said by this person on LWN.net: http://ur1.ca/9q4ky (final paragraph)

      about 11 months ago
    • jezra jezra

      @fontana and if there is no viable FLOSS alternative should the user just do without?

      about 11 months ago
    • Richard Fontana Richard Fontana jezra

      @jezra I'm not saying that (tho' some might feel that way) - rather just saying, be honest that you host both free and nonfree software

      about 11 months ago
    • Jeff Ratliff Jeff Ratliff

      I don't believe the non-free repository is official. It's hard to determine what "official" really means in Debian, though.

      about 11 months ago
    • jxself jxself Jeff Ratliff

      @gomerx I can go to debian.org and download non-free software. Does "official" matter? Still distributing it either way.

      about 11 months ago
    • jezra jezra

      @fontana I see it as a Distro meeting the desires of it's users by including the freedom to let the user install what they want

      about 11 months ago
    • Jeff Ratliff Jeff Ratliff jxself

      "Official" matters in the context of the original question. Debian doesn't encourage the use of non-free software. Your opinion may differ.

      about 11 months ago
    • jxself jxself Jeff Ratliff

      @gomerx So "unofficial" non-free is somehow better than "official" non-free? Seem like a way to justify distribution of non-free software.

      about 11 months ago
    • Jeff Ratliff Jeff Ratliff jxself

      No. That's not what I said at all. Debian chooses to allow people to use non-free if they want. That's freedom to me.

      about 11 months ago
    • jxself jxself Jeff Ratliff

      @gomerx "Freedom is not measured by the number of choices. That's the wrong way to analyze it, and leads to very bad conclusions."

      about 11 months ago
    • jxself jxself Jeff Ratliff

      @gomerx To quote http://ur1.ca/9q586

      about 11 months ago
    • Jeff Ratliff Jeff Ratliff jxself

      I understand. I just disagree with his position. RMS is right on a lot of stuff, but not this.

      about 11 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm quotes , Jeff Ratliff , jxself , rms

      @jxself "In general, freedom means having control of your own life."~ @rms !q @gomerx point: Debian users make own choice #control #freewill

      about 11 months ago
    • jxself jxself laurelrusswurm

      @laurelrusswurm Exactly but this isn't about what people do on their own computers but Debian's actions. I like this: http://ur1.ca/9q5qd

      about 11 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm jxself

      @jxself (1) "what Debian does for them" and (2) "what Debian directs them towards" are two very different things.

      about 11 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm jxself

      @jxself I would accept that Debian actively promoting non-free would be an issue; but not making a non-free software repository available

      about 11 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm jxself

      @jxself part of why Free Software works well is repositories, which is radically different from proprietary software (or at least windows)

      about 11 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm jxself

      @jxself It may not seem to be a big issue to tech people like you, but non techs like me haven't the faintest idea how to make a repository

      about 11 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm jxself

      @jxself which means that denying inclusion of proprietary software in repositories effectively removes choice from non tech folk like me

      about 11 months ago
Cornify

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Gomertronic is a microblogging service brought to you by Gomer_X. It runs the StatusNet microblogging software, version 1.0.1, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Gomertronic content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to mobile site layout.